Vegetative and reproductive response of `Prime Giant¿ sweet cherry trees to regulated deficit irrigation

Journal ar
Scientia Horticulturae
  • Volumen: 249
  • Fecha: 30 April 2019
  • Páginas: 478-489
  • ISSN: 03044238
  • Source Type: Journal
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.016
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
© 2019 The Authors The agronomic response of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) `Prime Giant¿ to a 4 year-long experiment involving deficit irrigation strategies in a Mediterranean climate was studied in a commercial orchard located in the southeast of Spain (Jumilla, Spain). Four drip irrigation treatments were imposed: (i) control treatment (CTL), irrigated without restrictions at 110% of seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ETc); (ii) sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) treatment irrigated at 85% ETc during pre-harvest and post-harvest periods and at 100% ETc during floral differentiation; (iii) regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatment irrigated at 100% ETc during pre-harvest and floral differentiation and at 55% ETc during post-harvest, and (iv) farmer treatment (FRM), irrigated according to the farmer's normal practice. The crop's response to the different irrigation treatments was analyzed in relation to tree water status. Soil water deficit reduced tree midday stem water potential (¿ stem ), stomatal conductance (gs) and net photosynthesis (Pn). Branch maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) responded rapidly to irrigation changes during pre-harvest and post-harvest. The lowest ¿ stem values were reached by SDI during pre-harvest and by RDI and FRM during post-harvest. RDI did not lead to ¿ stem water potentials falling to below the threshold of ¿1.6 MPa in any season, although, FRM caused, ¿ stem to fall below ¿1.8 MPa in 2017. RDI reduced vegetative growth and did not cause significant lower yields or fruit quality. However, with SDI there was a trend towards smaller fruits and a slightly higher soluble solid content. Post-harvest deficit irrigation increased water productivity without penalizing fruit yield or the quality parameters studied, and allowed water savings of 39% compared to CTL at a time when other fruit tree species require more water. Moreover, RDI and SDI led to significantly less cracking incidence and a lower cracking index, which could extend fruit shelf life.

Author keywords

    Indexed keywords

      Funding details