Corrigendum to "Evaluation of the environmental plasticity in the xerohalophyte Zygophyllum fabago L. for the phytomanagement of mine tailings in semiarid areas" [Chemosphere 161 (2016) 259-265](S0045653516309080)(10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.024)

© 2016 The authors regret that there was the following editorial error which was not identified in the process of proofreading and which could lead to an erratic reading of the results: the ¿18O was wrongly typed as ¿13O through the manuscript. So, all the ¿13O should be read and interpreted as ¿18O. Abstract; Line 11 should be: The lower ¿13C and ¿18O in the plants sampled at both tailings compared to the control ones may indicate softer stomatal regulation in relation to the control site plants and therefore lower WUE. Section 1; Paragraph 1, Lines 21¿25 should be: The isotopic composition of plant tissues (¿13C and ¿18O) has been used to characterise different strategies of resources acquisition in plants as well as to infer the physiological responses of plants to environmental changes. Section 2.2; Paragraph 8, Lines 7¿8 should be: Leaf ¿18O analyses were performed using an elemental PyroCube. Section 3.2; Paragraph 3, Lines 1¿2 should be: The stable isotopes (¿13C and ¿18O) showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values at the control site than at the tailings piles. Section 3.2; Paragraph 3, Lines 10¿13 should be: In addition, proline and total chlorophyll contents showed strong positive correlation (r ~ 0.9, p < 0.01) with the foliar contents of N, P, K, ¿13C and ¿18O and soil DOC concentrations. Section 3.2; Paragraph 4, Lines 9¿13 should be: In addition, simultaneous measurements of ¿13C and ¿18O in plant organic matter may help in separating the independent effects of carbon fixation and stomatal conductance on ¿13C, as ¿18O is dependent on stomatal conductance but not on rubisco activity. Section 3.2; Paragraph 5, Lines 1¿3 should be: The lower ¿13C and ¿18O in the plants sampled at both tailings may indicate softer stomatal regulation in relation to the control site plants and therefore lower WUE. Section 3.2; Paragraph 6, Lines 10¿11 should be: a strong stomatal control could explain the higher values of ¿18O in the Z. fabago leaves of the control site. Section 3.2; Paragraph 6, Lines 31¿34 should be: This statement is supported by the significant positive correlations (r ~ 0.9, p < 0.01) found between proline and ¿13C, ¿18O, N, P and K concentrations in leaves. Table 2, ¿13O should be read and interpreted as ¿18O.